{"id":281,"date":"2020-12-01T22:21:21","date_gmt":"2020-12-01T22:21:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.operacoesweb.uff.br\/migrajoomla\/?p=281"},"modified":"2020-12-01T22:21:21","modified_gmt":"2020-12-01T22:21:21","slug":"projeto-capes-print-rede-internacional-de-pesquisa-sobre-administracao-de-conflitos-em-espacos-publicos-plurais-desigualdades-justicas-e-cidadanias-em-perspectiva-comparada","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.operacoesweb.uff.br\/migrajoomla\/?p=281","title":{"rendered":"Projeto Capes PRINT: Rede Internacional de Pesquisa sobre administra\u00e7\u00e3o de conflitos em espa\u00e7os p\u00fablicos plurais: desigualdades, justi\u00e7as e cidadanias em perspectiva comparada"},"content":{"rendered":"

T\u00edtulo do projeto Capes PRINT : Rede Internacional de Pesquisa sobre administra\u00e7\u00e3o de conflitos em espa\u00e7os p\u00fablicos plurais: desigualdades, justi\u00e7as e cidadanias em perspectiva comparada.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Title of Research Project: “International Research Network on Conflict Management in Plural Public Spaces: Inequalities, Justice and Citizenship in a Comparative Perspective”<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Coordenador:<\/strong> Prof. Dr. Fabio Reis Mota (PPGA\/InEAC\/NUFEP-UFF)<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Equipe Cient\u00edfica brasileira:
<\/strong>Roberto Kant de Lima: http:\/\/lattes.cnpq.br\/5653459744288495 <\/a>
Lucia Eilbaum: http:\/\/lattes.cnpq.br\/8788800913405278 <\/a>
Lenin dos Santos Pires: http:\/\/lattes.cnpq.br\/6473783273255196 <\/a>
Laura Graziela Figueiredo Fernandes Gomes: http:\/\/lattes.cnpq.br\/1736294295596552 <\/a>
Simoni Lahud Guedes: http:\/\/lattes.cnpq.br\/1578239902547594 <\/a>(IN MEMORIAM)
Ana Paula Mendes de Miranda: http:\/\/lattes.cnpq.br\/1955313077111684 <\/a>
Paulo Gabriel Hilu da Rocha Pinto: http:\/\/lattes.cnpq.br\/8062611479303200 <\/a>
Gisele Fonseca Chagas: http:\/\/lattes.cnpq.br\/4429136951105507 <\/a>
Marco Ant\u00f4nio da Silva Mello: http:\/\/lattes.cnpq.br\/9789234116141323 <\/a>
Felipe Berocan Veiga: http:\/\/lattes.cnpq.br\/3438944499886878 <\/a>
Edilson M\u00e1rcio Almeida da Silva: http:\/\/lattes.cnpq.br\/7571673783269289<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Pesquisadores Estrangeiros:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0AFRICA DO SUL:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Julia Hornberger – Professora Senior na University of Konstanz. Pesquisadora associada ao African Centre for Migration and Society(ACMS), na na University of the Witwatersrand, \u00c1frica do Sul. University of the Witwatersrand<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

ARGENTINA:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Gabriel Nardacchione- Professor da UBA, pesquisador do CONICET e Gino Germani.<\/p>\n

Mar\u00eda Victoria Pita \u2013 diretora do Instituto de Ci\u00eancias Antropol\u00f3gicas da Faculdade de Filosofia e Letras da UBA, Coordenadora do Equipo de Antropolog\u00eda Pol\u00edtica y Jur\u00eddica\/UBA<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

CANAD\u00c1:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Jo\u00e3o Velloso- Professor da Ottawa, no Centre de Recherche et d\u2019Enseignement sur les droits de la personne. Pesquisador do NUFEP\/UFF, INCT\/InEAC e do CRDP\/ Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al.<\/p>\n

Karine Vanthuyne – Professora associada da Faculty of Social Sciences na Ottawa<\/p>\n

Marie-Eve Sylvestre – Professora na uOttawa. Professora visitante da Paris X-Nanterre (2010).<\/p>\n

Meg Stalcup – Professora associada da Faculty of Social Sciences na University of Ottawa<\/p>\n

Marie-Christine Doran – Professora associada da Faculty of Social Sciences na University of Ottawa e consultora internacional do InEAC.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

ESTADOS UNIDOS:<\/strong><\/p>\n

George Bisharat – Professor da Hastings College of the Law, University of California<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

FRAN\u00c7A:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ren\u00e9 Levy- Pesquisador do CESDIP\/CNRS.<\/p>\n

Laurent Th\u00e9venot – Diretor de estudos EHESS, administrador INSEE – Laboratoire de Sociologie Quantitative (CREST), Membro fundador do antigo Groupe de Sociologie Politique et Morale (EHESS \u2013CNRS).<\/p>\n

Pedro Jos\u00e9 Garc\u00eda S\u00e1nchez – Universit\u00e9 Paris Ouest Nanterre La D\u00e9fense\/UPX. Pesquisador do MOSA\u00cfQUES\/UMR e LAVUE<\/p>\n

Dejan Dimitrijevic – Professor e Diretor do LADEC (Laboratoire d\u2019anthropologie des enjeux contemporains) Universit\u00e9 de Lyon 2<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Martin Soares – Professor e Pesquisador do\u00a0\u00a0do LADEC (Laboratoire d\u2019anthropologie des enjeux contemporains) Universit\u00e9 de Lyon 2<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Alain Battegay – Pesquisador do CNRS e do Laborat\u00f3rio Max Weber.\u00a0<\/div>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

M\u00c9XICO:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Medardo Tapia Uribe – Pesquisador do CRIM\/ UNAM..<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

PORTUGAL:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Alexandre Cotovio Martins \u2013 Professor da Escola Superior de Educa\u00e7\u00e3o e Ci\u00eancias Sociais de Portalegre. Vice-Presidente do Conselho T\u00e9cnico-Cient\u00edfico. Coordenador do Departamento de Ci\u00eancias Sociais, Territ\u00f3rio e Desenvolvimento.<\/p>\n

Bruno Dion\u00edsio \u2013 Professor da Universidade de \u00c9vora Portugal e investigador integrado do Centro Interdisciplinar de Ci\u00eancias Sociais da Universidade Nova de Lisboa.<\/p>\n

Jos\u00e9 Manuel Resende – Professor Catedr\u00e1tico da Universidade de \u00c9vora<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

SU\u00cd\u00c7A:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Marc Breviglieri \u2013 Professor do HETS\/Gen\u00e8ve. Pesquisador do ENSAG\/CNRS.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

E-mail v\u00e1lido do coordenador:<\/strong> reismota@gmail.com.<\/p>\n

Projeto vinculado ao Programa de P\u00f3s-Gradua\u00e7\u00e3o da UFF: Programa de P\u00f3s-Gradua\u00e7\u00e3o em Antropologia (PPGA) e ao INCT-InEAC da Universidade Federal Fluminense.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o do Projeto<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

A proposta de constru\u00e7\u00e3o da \u201cRede Internacional de pesquisa sobre administra\u00e7\u00e3o de conflitos em espa\u00e7os p\u00fablicos plurais: desigualdades, justi\u00e7as e cidadanias em perspectiva comparada\u201d resulta da consolida\u00e7\u00e3o do trabalho de delineamento de coopera\u00e7\u00f5es interinstitucionais que tiveram in\u00edcio em 1994 com a cria\u00e7\u00e3o do Programa de P\u00f3s-Gradua\u00e7\u00e3o em Antropologia e Ci\u00eancia Pol\u00edtica (PPGACP), atualmente Programa de P\u00f3s-Gradua\u00e7\u00e3o em Antropologia (PPGA, a partir de 2002), consolidando-se no Programa \u201cInstitutos Nacionais de Ci\u00eancia e Tecnologia\u201d, com o Instituto de Estudos Comparados em<\/p>\n

Administra\u00e7\u00e3o de Conflitos (InEAC-UFF) aprovado em 2009 e renovado em 2014 (com o financiamento at\u00e9 2022) em chamadas realizadas pelo Minist\u00e9rio da Ci\u00eancia Tecnologia e Inova\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n

Em nossa rede buscamos problematizar o conceito espa\u00e7o p\u00fablico ressaltando o seu car\u00e1ter plural, permeado por controv\u00e9rsias, no qual as intera\u00e7\u00f5es e testes postas aos atores permite a estes um repert\u00f3rio vasto de compet\u00eancias (citadinas, c\u00edvicas, morais etc.) para a administra\u00e7\u00e3o de seus conflitos. Quando posta \u00e0 prova pelas situa\u00e7\u00f5es de intera\u00e7\u00e3o e disputa, a categoria \u201cp\u00fablico\u201d se reveste de um conjunto de significados em conformidade com as situa\u00e7\u00f5es apresentadas e de acordo com os m\u00faltiplos sentidos e declina\u00e7\u00f5es que adquire e lhe v\u00e3o sendo atribu\u00eddas nas arquiteturas da vida comum. Nossa inten\u00e7\u00e3o, portanto, consiste em buscar evidenciar as diferentes concep\u00e7\u00f5es de \u201c p\u00fablico\u201d, \u201c publique\u201d, \u201c public\u201d, por exemplo, e seus impactos na produ\u00e7\u00e3o de rela\u00e7\u00f5es fundadas na igualdade, desigualdade, diferen\u00e7a, semelhan\u00e7a, concedendo distintos contornos aos sistemas de justi\u00e7a e m\u00faltiplas fei\u00e7\u00f5es ao sentido de \u201cdemocracia\u201d e \u201ccidadania\u201d. A partir da compara\u00e7\u00e3o pelo contraste, pretendemos evidenciar essas diferen\u00e7as de modo a explicitar as caracter\u00edsticas dos Estados Na\u00e7\u00f5es modernos que fazem parte da presente Proposta e fazer emergir as diferentes formas de produ\u00e7\u00e3o de desigualdades, dentre elas a jur\u00eddica, t\u00e3o marcante especialmente em pa\u00edses de tradi\u00e7\u00e3o p\u00f3s-colonial (Argentina, \u00c1frica do Sul, M\u00e9xico, Canad\u00e1, Fran\u00e7a, EUA, Ilhas Maur\u00edcio e Portugal).<\/p>\n

Como assinalam Roberto Kant de Lima (2000) e Boltanski e Th\u00e9venot (1991), a quest\u00e3o do espa\u00e7o p\u00fablico deve ser analisada n\u00e3o apenas em rela\u00e7\u00e3o a sua propriedade \u2013 p\u00fablica ou privada, mas em rela\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e0s formas de sua apropria\u00e7\u00e3o \u2013 universalizadas ou particularizadas, como ocorrem tanto no ambiente dom\u00e9stico da casa quanto no ambiente p\u00fablico da rua. Visa, portanto, as formas como os atores e institui\u00e7\u00f5es se apropriam destes espa\u00e7os informados por l\u00f3gicas distintas, sejam elas \u201cindividualistas\u201d e \u201cigualit\u00e1rias\u201d ou \u201cholistas\u201d e \u201chier\u00e1rquicas\u201d, combinando de modo din\u00e2mico tais princ\u00edpios na administra\u00e7\u00e3o dos conflitos cotidianos. Neste sentido, \u00e9 importante compreender de que modo essas opera\u00e7\u00f5es se inscrevem em distintas l\u00f3gicas ou ordens de grandeza.<\/p>\n

Embora o enfoque anal\u00edtico desta proposta de Conven\u00e7\u00e3o e do Programa de Pesquisa nela consubstanciado se concentre em institui\u00e7\u00f5es oficiais republicanas e democr\u00e1ticas, a base te\u00f3rica que fundamenta a pesquisa \u00e9 oriunda da perspectiva relativizadora acima apontada. Isto significa que as refer\u00eancias \u00e0 Rep\u00fablica e ao Estado Democr\u00e1tico de Direito, apesar de serem aspectos fundamentais para a discuss\u00e3o aqui apresentada, n\u00e3o s\u00e3o o ponto de partida da pesquisa, mas a acompanham, em todos os seus n\u00edveis, estando presentes nas reflex\u00f5es derivadas de nossas etnografias. Ap\u00f3s esse esfor\u00e7o de relativiza\u00e7\u00e3o, afigura-se ent\u00e3o poss\u00edvel confrontar as formas explicitadas de administra\u00e7\u00e3o e resolu\u00e7\u00e3o de conflitos e disputas em rela\u00e7\u00e3o aos valores republicanos e democr\u00e1ticos; valores caros \u00e0 tradi\u00e7\u00e3o ocidental do Estado-Na\u00e7\u00e3o. Ou seja, nosso interesse \u00e9 buscar evidenciar as l\u00f3gicas e fundamentos inerentes \u00e0s formas de administra\u00e7\u00e3o de conflitos. Desse modo, a compara\u00e7\u00e3o, por meio da internacionaliza\u00e7\u00e3o dos pesquisadores (e n\u00e3o apenas de suas pesquisas) permite o adensamento no exerc\u00edcio de an\u00e1lise dos fen\u00f4menos sociais com os quais nos confrontamos, explicitando pelo contraste caracter\u00edsticas de outra forma ocultas e impl\u00edcitas em nossa sociedade e cultura.<\/p>\n

Nesse mesmo sentido, \u00e9 preciso contextualizar categorias, como \u201cp\u00fablico\u201d, \u201cdireito\u201d, \u201cjusti\u00e7a\u201d, \u201csistema judicial e policial\u201d, \u201cseguran\u00e7a p\u00fablica\u201d, \u201cdireitos\u201d, \u201cprivil\u00e9gios\u201d, \u201cigualdades\u201d e \u201cdesigualdades\u201d entre outras; e problematizar a representa\u00e7\u00e3o e o papel que desempenham nos estados ocidentais modernos. Como j\u00e1 foi sublinhado, apesar da refer\u00eancia aos valores republicanos e democr\u00e1ticos constituir-se aqui como fundamental, n\u00e3o \u00e9 dif\u00edcil reconhecer a exist\u00eancia de l\u00f3gicas informadas por outros valores que n\u00e3o estes, assim como buscamos evidenciar na discuss\u00e3o acima.<\/p>\n

Atrav\u00e9s dessa coopera\u00e7\u00e3o diversos estudantes de doutorado e professores do Programa de P\u00f3s-Gradua\u00e7\u00e3o em Antropologia (PPGA) da Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) podem internacionalizar sua produ\u00e7\u00e3o atrav\u00e9s de est\u00e1gios, miss\u00f5es de estudo e miss\u00f5es de trabalho, interagindo com os diferentes grupos de pesquisa e realizando trabalhos de campo nos<\/p>\n

diferentes pa\u00edses que comp\u00f5em a proposta. Ainda pretende-se acolher professores estrangeiros na P\u00f3s Gradua\u00e7\u00e3o , ampliando os horizontes anal\u00edticos e etnogr\u00e1ficos com a realiza\u00e7\u00e3o de disciplinas ministradas pelos professores inseridos na Rede na l\u00edngua inglesa, francesa e espanhola. A realiza\u00e7\u00e3o de semin\u00e1rios em Congressos, na pr\u00f3pria UFF e em diferentes pa\u00edses membros da rede, ser\u00e3o outras estrat\u00e9gias lan\u00e7adas para a manuten\u00e7\u00e3o dos la\u00e7os institucionais e o modo de solidificar as colabora\u00e7\u00f5es existentes e ampliar as que ser\u00e3o constru\u00eddas ao longo da vig\u00eancia do Projeto. Propomos, ainda, a realiza\u00e7\u00e3o de v\u00eddeo\u2013palestras realizadas com os pesquisadores estrangeiros e brasileiros, produzidas no est\u00fadio situado na sede administrativa do InEAC, o NEPEAC \u2013 N\u00facleo de Ensino, Pesquisa e Extens\u00e3o em Administra\u00e7\u00e3o de Conflitos, vinculado \u00e0 PROPPI\/UFF, sobre temas afeitos \u00e0 proposta, cujo conte\u00fado poder\u00e1 ser disseminado de v\u00e1rias maneiras (m\u00eddias escrita, internet, etc.).<\/p>\n

Cabe, por fim, salientar que o Instituto Nacional de Ci\u00eancia e Tecnologia \u2013 Instituto de Estudos Comparados em Administra\u00e7\u00e3o de Conflitos, INCT-InEAC, do qual o PPGA\/UFF \u00e9 membro, \u00e9 um projeto de constru\u00e7\u00e3o de uma rede multidisciplinar que envolve mais de 100 doutores de 8 pa\u00edses (Brasil, Fran\u00e7a, EUA, Canad\u00e1, Argentina, Portugal, Sui\u00e7a e Ilhas Maur\u00edcio) e 7 estados brasileiros, cujas forma\u00e7\u00f5es s\u00e3o do dom\u00ednio da Antropologia, Sociologia, Direito, Hist\u00f3ria, Ci\u00eancia Pol\u00edtica e Estat\u00edstica, institucionalmente comprometidos com o estudo e a difus\u00e3o de tecnologias sociais inovadoras nessa \u00e1rea altamente sens\u00edvel de nossa sociedade, o que empresta ao projeto um car\u00e1ter inovador e interdisciplinar hoje fundamental para a abordagem consistente e aprofundada dos temas presentes na atual proposta (www.ineac.uff.br).<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

English<\/strong><\/p>\n

The proposal to build the “International Research Network on Conflict Management in Plural Public Spaces: Inequalities, Justice and Citizenship in a Comparative Perspective” is a consolidation of results from the work of<\/p>\n

designing interinstitutional cooperation that began in 1994 with the creation of the Graduate Program in Anthropology and Political Science (PPGACP), currently the Graduate Program in Anthropology (PPGA, since 2002), consolidating in the “Institutes of Science and Technology” Program, with the Institute of Comparative Studies in Conflict Resolution (InEAC-UFF) approved in 2009 and renewed in 2014 by the National Institutes of Science and Technology Program from Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (with a financing up to 2022).<\/p>\n

This project starts from the observation that the public space is by excellence the place of the controversy, the interactions and tests in which the actors make use of their competences (urban, civic, moral etc.) for the administration of their conflicts. When put to the test by situations of interaction and dispute, the “public” category takes on a set of meanings in accordance with the situations presented and according to the multiple senses and declinations that it acquires and are attributed to it in the architectures of common life. Our intention, therefore, is to seek to highlight the different conceptions of \u201cp\u00fablico\u201d, “public”, “publique”, for example, and their impact on the production of relations based on equality, inequality, difference, justice, law and multiple meanings of “democracy” and “citizenship” in different social and political contexts. From the comparison by contrast, we intend to highlight these differences in order to make the characteristics of the modern Nations States that are part of this Proposal explicit, bringing about the emergence of different forms of production of inequalities, among them those present in the legal systems, so remarkable specially in countries with post colonial traditions. Argentina, South Africa, Mexico, Canada, France, USA, Mauritius and Portugal).<\/p>\n

As Roberto Kant de Lima (2000) and Boltanski and Th\u00e9venot (1991) point out, the question of public space must be analyzed not only in relation to its public or private property, but in relation to the forms of its appropriation \u2013 either universalized or particularized, as they occur both in the domestic environment of the house and in the public environment of the street. The proposal, therefore, is to shed light upon the ways in which actors and institutions appropriate these spaces informed by different logics, whether they be “individualistic” and “egalitarian” or “holistic” and “hierarchical”, by dynamically<\/p>\n

combining such principles in the management of everyday conflicts. In this sense, it is important to understand how these operations are inscribed in different logics or orders of magnitude<\/p>\n

Although the analytical approach of this proposal for a Convention and the Research Program embodied in it is focused on official republican and democratic institutions, the theoretical basis for the research is derived from the relativizing perspective mentioned above. This means that the references to the Republic and the Democratic State of Law, although they are fundamental aspects to the discussion presented here, are not the starting point of the research, but accompany it at all levels, being present in the reflections derived from our ethnographies. After this effort of relativization, it is then possible to contrast and confront the explicit forms of administration and resolution of conflicts and disputes in relation to republican and democratic values; values cherished by the Western tradition of the nation-state. That is, our interest is to seek to shed light upon the logic and foundations inherent in the forms of conflict management. Thereby, the comparison, through the internationalization of the researchers (and not only of their research subject), allows the analysis of the social phenomena with which we confront each other, explaining by contrast the characteristics that are otherwise hidden and implicit in our society and culture.<\/p>\n

In this sense, it is necessary to contextualize categories such as “public”, “law”, “justice”, “judicial and police system”, “public security”, \u201crights\u201d, “privileges” and “inequalities”, among others; and to problematize the representation and role they play in modern Western states. As already pointed out, although the reference to republican and democratic values is fundamental here, it is not difficult to recognize the existence of social, legal and political logics informed by values other than these, as we have tried to highlight in the above discussion.<\/p>\n

Through this cooperation, several doctoral students and teachers of the Graduate Program in Anthropology (PPGA) of the Fluminense Federal University (UFF) can internationalize their production through internships, study missions and work missions, interacting with the different research groups and<\/p>\n

carrying out fieldwork in the different countries that make up the proposal. It is also intended to welcome foreign teachers in the Graduate Program, broadening the analytical and ethnographic horizons with the accomplishment of disciplines taught by the teachers inserted in the Network in English, French and Spanish. The seminars held at Congresses, in the UFF itself and in different member countries of the network, will be other strategies launched to maintain the institutional ties and the way to solidify the existing collaborations and expand those that will be built during the validity of the Project. We also propose the making of video – lectures given by foreign and Brazilian researchers on themes related to the proposal, whose content can be disseminated via networks (written media, internet etc.) produced in our studio at the InEAC administrative office at NEPEAC\/PROPPI\/UFF, a research and extension Nucleus linked to the Research, Graduate Programs and Innovation Vice-Presidency of UFF.<\/p>\n

Lastly, it should be noted that National Institute of Science and Technology \u2013 Institute for Comparative Study of Conflicts of which the Graduate Program of Anthropology is a member is a multidisciplinary network project involving more than 100 doctors from 8 countries (Brazil, France, USA, Canada, Argentina, Portugal, Switzerland and Mauritius) and 7 Brazilian states, whose backgrounds are in the field of Anthropology, Sociology, Law, History, Political Science and Statistics, institutionally compromised to produce and diffuse social Innovation and social technologies in this highly sensitive area of our society which gives the project an innovative and interdisciplinary character that is fundamental to a consistent and in-depth approach to the themes present in the current proposal (www.ineac.uff.br).<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Objetivos do Projeto<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

O \u201cestar em campo\u201d constitui uma experi\u00eancia fundamental \u00e0 inicia\u00e7\u00e3o profissional no dom\u00ednio da Antropologia. Nesse sentido, estar entre aqueles que elegemos como nossos interlocutores\/iniciadores produz no pesquisador<\/p>\n

um abrupto deslocamento entre as teorias e suas repercuss\u00f5es nas condi\u00e7\u00f5es dos ajustamentos bem formuladas e apreendidas no dom\u00ednio cognitivo e metodol\u00f3gico. No seu processo de socializa\u00e7\u00e3o, o deslocamento compreende uma etapa fundamental na forma\u00e7\u00e3o profissional e na constru\u00e7\u00e3o controlada das compara\u00e7\u00f5es<\/p>\n

A natureza do conhecimento antropol\u00f3gico \u00e9 comparativa e contrastiva no exerc\u00edcio de relativiza\u00e7\u00e3o e estranhamento exigido pelo compreens\u00e3o sobre as diferentes facetas da vida em comum. Diferentemente das hard sciences, cujos m\u00e9todos e teorias podem adquirir generalidade e universalidade em virtude de suas caracter\u00edsticas \u2013 j\u00e1 que se tratam de conhecimentos protocolarizados e regulados pela relativa previsibilidade concedida pelo laborat\u00f3rio -, nas Ci\u00eancias Sociais as condi\u00e7\u00f5es sociais podem resultar em significativos ajustamentos das condi\u00e7\u00f5es de produ\u00e7\u00e3o das teorias para a melhor compreens\u00e3o da complexidade dos fen\u00f4menos sociais. Adquirindo a familiaridade com outra cultura ou sistema de valores, o cientista social desempenha o papel de traduzi-los, tornando-os intelig\u00edveis para o pr\u00f3prio sistema de significados ao qual ele est\u00e1 referido. Cumpre salientar que esta tradu\u00e7\u00e3o se realiza numa intera\u00e7\u00e3o entre observado e observador, na medida em que este \u00e9 parte obrigat\u00f3ria do campo de observa\u00e7\u00e3o: o quadro que ele fornece sobre o outro \u00e9 algo visto e interpretado por algu\u00e9m, em um momento particular e em circunst\u00e2ncias espec\u00edficas. Nessa perspectiva, cabe ao cientista social, para que possa compreender outro sistema, construir dados que sejam compar\u00e1veis \u201caqui\u201d e \u201cl\u00e1\u201d, permitindo que a explicita\u00e7\u00e3o das categorias estranhas a ele possibilite a compreens\u00e3o de sua pr\u00f3pria cultura, estabelecendo as similitudes e diferen\u00e7as entre dois ou mais sistemas de valores.<\/p>\n

A experi\u00eancia prolongada em outra sociedade, proporcionada pelo est\u00e1gio no exterior, fornece ao profissional das ci\u00eancias sociais compet\u00eancias e experi\u00eancias cruciais para sua forma\u00e7\u00e3o acad\u00eamica, pela possibilidade de se inserir de modo cont\u00ednuo em outro sistema de pensamento, exigindo a reorienta\u00e7\u00e3o cognitiva a partir do estranhamento. Por outro lado, a rela\u00e7\u00e3o estabelecida in loco com cientistas sociais de outros pa\u00edses permite apreender as diferentes vers\u00f5es de antropologia<\/p>\n

relacionados aos valores de nation-building. Afinal, partimos do pressuposto de que, apesar de seu car\u00e1ter universalista, por ser te\u00f3rica a proposta da antropologia e da sociologia, o trabalho antropol\u00f3gico e sociol\u00f3gico reflete a heterogeneidade de diferentes configura\u00e7\u00f5es s\u00f3cio-culturais. Da\u00ed a relev\u00e2ncia de produzir dispositivos sim\u00e9tricos de coopera\u00e7\u00e3o que permitam a confec\u00e7\u00e3o de um arcabou\u00e7o te\u00f3rico de envergadura internacional, proporcionando que as teorias formuladas em diferentes condi\u00e7\u00f5es sociais (e sociol\u00f3gicas) possam ser postas \u00e0 prova diante das m\u00faltiplas configura\u00e7\u00f5es sociais, simb\u00f3licas e pol\u00edticas com as quais a Rede pretende interagir ao longo desse 4 anos. Proporcionar a interlocu\u00e7\u00e3o e o trabalho conjunto entre pesquisadores membros de continentes diferentes, detentores de l\u00ednguas e tradi\u00e7\u00f5es sociol\u00f3gicas distintas, propiciar\u00e1 a conforma\u00e7\u00e3o de um ambiente de experimenta\u00e7\u00f5es te\u00f3ricas e etnogr\u00e1ficas de suma import\u00e2ncia e relev\u00e2ncia \u00e0s Ci\u00eancias Sociais contempor\u00e2nea e colaborar\u00e1 para consolidar o papel de destaque da Antropologia produzida no interior do PPGA e InEAC \u2013 UFF.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

English<\/strong><\/p>\n

“Being in the field” constitutes a fundamental experience to the professional initiation in the field of Anthropology. In this sense, being among those that we choose as our interlocutors\/initiators produces in the researcher an abrupt displacement between theories and their repercussions in the conditions of well formulated and apprehended adjustments in the cognitive and methodological domain. In its socialization process, displacement comprises a fundamental stage in professional training and in the controlled construction of comparisons.<\/p>\n

The nature of anthropological knowledge is comparative and contrastive in the exercise of relativization and estrangement required by the understanding of the different facets of life in common. Unlike the hard sciences, whose methods and theories can acquire generality and universality by virtue of their characteristics – as they are protocoled knowledge, regulated by the relative predictability granted by the laboratory -, social conditions can result in significant adjustments of the conditions of theories for a better understanding of the complexity of social phenomena. Acquiring familiarity with another culture or<\/p>\n

value system, the social scientist plays the role of translating them, making them intelligible to the very system of meanings to which he is referred. It should be noted that this translation takes place in an interaction between observed and observer, as this is a mandatory part of the field of observation: the framework it provides about the other is something seen and interpreted by someone at a particular moment and in specific circumstances. In this perspective, it is up to the social scientist, so that he can understand another system, to construct data that are comparable “here” and “there”, allowing the to make explicit of the categories foreign to him to allow a better understanding of his own culture, establishing the similarities and differences between two or more value systems.<\/p>\n

Prolonged experience in another society, provided by the internship abroad, provides the professional of the social sciences with skills and experiences that are crucial for their academic training, for the possibility of being continuously inserted in another system of thought, requiring cognitive reorientation from strangeness. On the other hand, the relation established in loco with social scientists of other countries allows one to apprehend the different versions of anthropology and sociology developed in contexts related to the values of nation-building. After all, we start from the assumption that, despite its universalist character, as the proposal of anthropology and sociology is theoretical, anthropological and sociological work reflects the heterogeneity of different socio-cultural configurations. Hence the importance of producing symmetrical cooperation devices that allow the creation of a theoretical framework of international scope, providing that theories formulated in different social (and sociological) conditions can be put to the test in face of the multiple social, symbolic and political configurations with which the Network intends to interact during this 4 years. Providing interlocution and joint work between researchers from different continents, holders of distinct languages and sociological traditions, will provide an environment for theoretical and ethnographic experiments of great importance and relevance to the contemporary social sciences and will collaborate to consolidate the leading role of Anthropology produced within the PPGA and InEAC – UFF.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

A previs\u00e3o de colabora\u00e7\u00e3o na contrapartida se dar\u00e1 atrav\u00e9s da elabora\u00e7\u00e3o de editais de fomentos no exterior da Uni\u00e3o Europ\u00e9ia, Fulbright, dentre outros.<\/p>\n

Cooperations already formalized are attached as well as the terms of agreement of the researchers involved<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T\u00edtulo do projeto Capes PRINT : Rede Internacional de Pesquisa sobre administra\u00e7\u00e3o de conflitos em espa\u00e7os p\u00fablicos plurais: desigualdades, justi\u00e7as e cidadanias em perspectiva comparada. \u00a0 Title of Research Project: “International Research Network on Conflict Management in Plural Public Spaces: Inequalities, Justice and Citizenship in a Comparative Perspective” \u00a0 Coordenador: Prof. Dr. Fabio Reis Mota… Continuar lendo Projeto Capes PRINT: Rede Internacional de Pesquisa sobre administra\u00e7\u00e3o de conflitos em espa\u00e7os p\u00fablicos plurais: desigualdades, justi\u00e7as e cidadanias em perspectiva comparada<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-281","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorised","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.operacoesweb.uff.br\/migrajoomla\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.operacoesweb.uff.br\/migrajoomla\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.operacoesweb.uff.br\/migrajoomla\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.operacoesweb.uff.br\/migrajoomla\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.operacoesweb.uff.br\/migrajoomla\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=281"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.operacoesweb.uff.br\/migrajoomla\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.operacoesweb.uff.br\/migrajoomla\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.operacoesweb.uff.br\/migrajoomla\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=281"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.operacoesweb.uff.br\/migrajoomla\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}